Finland vs Yemen: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Finland
- Yemen
How they compare
Yemen currently reports 59.89 1000 USD against 50.79 1000 USD in Finland, a difference of 9.1 1000 USD.
That makes Yemen's figure about 1.2 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 101st and Yemen ranks 98th of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 2 and Yemen in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 463.72 1000 USD | 67.68 1000 USD | 396.04 1000 USD | Finland |
| 2010s | 94.94 1000 USD | 144.78 1000 USD | 49.84 1000 USD | Yemen |
| 2020s | 121.56 1000 USD | 70.01 1000 USD | 51.55 1000 USD | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Finland or Yemen?
- Yemen, at 59.89 1000 USD against 50.79 1000 USD in Finland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Finland and Yemen?
- 9.1 1000 USD, with Yemen ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Yemen?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2020.
- How do Finland and Yemen rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Finland ranks 101st and Yemen ranks 98th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf