Ghana vs Suriname: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Ghana
- Suriname
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 230.08 1000 USD against 198.2 1000 USD in Suriname, a difference of 31.88 1000 USD.
That makes Ghana's figure about 1.2 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Ghana ahead.
Ghana ranks 73rd and Suriname ranks 76th of 173 countries.
Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19,707 1000 USD | 25.4 1000 USD | 19,681 1000 USD | Ghana |
| 2010s | 27,021 1000 USD | 107.61 1000 USD | 26,914 1000 USD | Ghana |
| 2020s | 4,062 1000 USD | 294.51 1000 USD | 3,768 1000 USD | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Ghana or Suriname?
- Ghana, at 230.08 1000 USD against 198.2 1000 USD in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Ghana and Suriname?
- 31.88 1000 USD, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Suriname?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
- How do Ghana and Suriname rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Ghana ranks 73rd and Suriname ranks 76th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf