Greenland vs Seychelles: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Greenland
- Seychelles
How they compare
Seychelles currently reports 3.72 1000 USD against 2.11 1000 USD in Greenland, a difference of 1.61 1000 USD.
That makes Seychelles's figure about 1.8 times Greenland's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Greenland ahead.
Greenland ranks 145th and Seychelles ranks 142nd of 173 countries.
Seychelles has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.07 1000 USD | 11.49 1000 USD | 5.42 1000 USD | Seychelles |
| 2010s | 3.42 1000 USD | 9.77 1000 USD | 6.35 1000 USD | Seychelles |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Greenland or Seychelles?
- Seychelles, at 3.72 1000 USD against 2.11 1000 USD in Greenland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Greenland and Seychelles?
- 1.61 1000 USD, with Seychelles ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Seychelles?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2016.
- How do Greenland and Seychelles rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Greenland ranks 145th and Seychelles ranks 142nd of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf