Guatemala vs Lebanon: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Guatemala
- Lebanon
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 65.62 1000 USD against 64.15 1000 USD in Lebanon, a difference of 1.47 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Lebanon ahead.
Guatemala ranks 95th and Lebanon ranks 96th of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Lebanon in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.26 1000 USD | 417 1000 USD | 410.74 1000 USD | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 30.85 1000 USD | 20.01 1000 USD | 10.84 1000 USD | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 101.75 1000 USD | 55.9 1000 USD | 45.85 1000 USD | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Guatemala or Lebanon?
- Guatemala, at 65.62 1000 USD against 64.15 1000 USD in Lebanon as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Guatemala and Lebanon?
- 1.47 1000 USD, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Lebanon?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Guatemala and Lebanon rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Guatemala ranks 95th and Lebanon ranks 96th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf