Guyana vs Jordan: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Guyana
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 95.83 1000 USD against 71.7 1000 USD in Guyana, a difference of 24.13 1000 USD.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.3 times Guyana's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Guyana ahead.
Guyana ranks 94th and Jordan ranks 91st of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 2 and Jordan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 371.02 1000 USD | 48.16 1000 USD | 322.86 1000 USD | Guyana |
| 2010s | 3,281 1000 USD | 122.84 1000 USD | 3,159 1000 USD | Guyana |
| 2020s | 82.6 1000 USD | 136.72 1000 USD | 54.12 1000 USD | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Guyana or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 95.83 1000 USD against 71.7 1000 USD in Guyana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Guyana and Jordan?
- 24.13 1000 USD, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Jordan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Guyana and Jordan rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Guyana ranks 94th and Jordan ranks 91st of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf