Guyana vs Solomon Islands: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Guyana
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 71.7 1000 USD against 61.03 1000 USD in Solomon Islands, a difference of 10.67 1000 USD.
That makes Guyana's figure about 1.2 times Solomon Islands's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Guyana has been ahead every year.
Guyana ranks 94th and Solomon Islands ranks 97th of 173 countries.
Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,633 1000 USD | 1.23 1000 USD | 1,632 1000 USD | Guyana |
| 2010s | 3,123 1000 USD | 65.25 1000 USD | 3,058 1000 USD | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Guyana or Solomon Islands?
- Guyana, at 71.7 1000 USD against 61.03 1000 USD in Solomon Islands as of 2022.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Guyana and Solomon Islands?
- 10.67 1000 USD, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Solomon Islands?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2018.
- How do Guyana and Solomon Islands rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Guyana ranks 94th and Solomon Islands ranks 97th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf