Guyana vs Zambia: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Guyana
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 75.58 1000 USD against 71.7 1000 USD in Guyana, a difference of 3.88 1000 USD.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Guyana's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Guyana ahead.
Guyana ranks 94th and Zambia ranks 93rd of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,793 1000 USD | 256.38 1000 USD | 2,537 1000 USD | Guyana |
| 2010s | 3,136 1000 USD | 423.37 1000 USD | 2,712 1000 USD | Guyana |
| 2020s | 93.5 1000 USD | 216.73 1000 USD | 123.23 1000 USD | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Guyana or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 75.58 1000 USD against 71.7 1000 USD in Guyana as of 2021.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Guyana and Zambia?
- 3.88 1000 USD, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Zambia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2020.
- How do Guyana and Zambia rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Guyana ranks 94th and Zambia ranks 93rd of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf