Hungary vs Slovenia: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Hungary
- Slovenia
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 2,651 1000 USD against 1,784 1000 USD in Slovenia, a difference of 867 1000 USD.
That makes Hungary's figure about 1.5 times Slovenia's.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.
Hungary ranks 41st and Slovenia ranks 44th of 173 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,354 1000 USD | 64.07 1000 USD | 2,290 1000 USD | Hungary |
| 2010s | 3,241 1000 USD | 184.25 1000 USD | 3,057 1000 USD | Hungary |
| 2020s | 1,832 1000 USD | 365.35 1000 USD | 1,467 1000 USD | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Hungary or Slovenia?
- Hungary, at 2,651 1000 USD against 1,784 1000 USD in Slovenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Hungary and Slovenia?
- 867 1000 USD, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Slovenia?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Hungary and Slovenia rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Hungary ranks 41st and Slovenia ranks 44th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf