Kazakhstan vs Namibia: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Kazakhstan
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0.09 1000 USD against 0.07 1000 USD in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.02 1000 USD.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.3 times Kazakhstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 167th and Namibia ranks 166th of 173 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 323.93 1000 USD | 12.61 1000 USD | 311.32 1000 USD | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 95.33 1000 USD | 11.52 1000 USD | 83.81 1000 USD | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Kazakhstan or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 0.09 1000 USD against 0.07 1000 USD in Kazakhstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Kazakhstan and Namibia?
- 0.02 1000 USD, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Namibia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2017.
- How do Kazakhstan and Namibia rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Kazakhstan ranks 167th and Namibia ranks 166th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf