Kenya vs Republic of Korea: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Kenya
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
Republic of Korea currently reports 537.05 1000 USD against 512.21 1000 USD in Kenya, a difference of 24.84 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Kenya ahead.
Kenya ranks 52nd and Republic of Korea ranks 51st of 163 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 1 and Republic of Korea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,533 1000 USD | 668.75 1000 USD | 1,864 1000 USD | Kenya |
| 2010s | 1,208 1000 USD | 1,297 1000 USD | 88.69 1000 USD | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Kenya or Republic of Korea?
- Republic of Korea, at 537.05 1000 USD against 512.21 1000 USD in Kenya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Kenya and Republic of Korea?
- 24.84 1000 USD, with Republic of Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Republic of Korea?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2018.
- How do Kenya and Republic of Korea rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Kenya ranks 52nd and Republic of Korea ranks 51st of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf