Kenya vs South Africa: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Kenya
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 595.26 1000 USD against 512.21 1000 USD in Kenya, a difference of 83.05 1000 USD.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.2 times Kenya's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2003 it was South Africa ahead.
Kenya ranks 52nd and South Africa ranks 50th of 163 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,883 1000 USD | 9,769 1000 USD | 6,886 1000 USD | South Africa |
| 2010s | 1,208 1000 USD | 4,923 1000 USD | 3,715 1000 USD | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Kenya or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 595.26 1000 USD against 512.21 1000 USD in Kenya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Kenya and South Africa?
- 83.05 1000 USD, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and South Africa?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2018.
- How do Kenya and South Africa rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Kenya ranks 52nd and South Africa ranks 50th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf