Lebanon vs Zambia: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Lebanon
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 75.58 1000 USD against 64.15 1000 USD in Lebanon, a difference of 11.43 1000 USD.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.2 times Lebanon's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Lebanon ahead.
Lebanon ranks 96th and Zambia ranks 93rd of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lebanon averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 215.55 1000 USD | 50.83 1000 USD | 164.72 1000 USD | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 73.47 1000 USD | 173.11 1000 USD | 99.64 1000 USD | Zambia |
| 2020s | 43.2 1000 USD | 75.58 1000 USD | 32.38 1000 USD | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Lebanon or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 75.58 1000 USD against 64.15 1000 USD in Lebanon as of 2021.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Lebanon and Zambia?
- 11.43 1000 USD, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Zambia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2021.
- How do Lebanon and Zambia rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Lebanon ranks 96th and Zambia ranks 93rd of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf