Luxembourg vs Malawi: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Luxembourg
- Malawi
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 31.62 1000 USD against 28.15 1000 USD in Malawi, a difference of 3.47 1000 USD.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 112th and Malawi ranks 114th of 173 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 148.35 1000 USD | 137.35 1000 USD | 10.99 1000 USD | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 94.23 1000 USD | 191.03 1000 USD | 96.8 1000 USD | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Luxembourg or Malawi?
- Luxembourg, at 31.62 1000 USD against 28.15 1000 USD in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Luxembourg and Malawi?
- 3.47 1000 USD, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Malawi?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2018.
- How do Luxembourg and Malawi rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Luxembourg ranks 112th and Malawi ranks 114th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf