Luxembourg vs Senegal: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Luxembourg
- Senegal
How they compare
Senegal currently reports 33.26 1000 USD against 31.62 1000 USD in Luxembourg, a difference of 1.64 1000 USD.
That makes Senegal's figure about 1.1 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 112th and Senegal ranks 110th of 173 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 146.59 1000 USD | 97.87 1000 USD | 48.72 1000 USD | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 84.72 1000 USD | 57.18 1000 USD | 27.54 1000 USD | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Luxembourg or Senegal?
- Senegal, at 33.26 1000 USD against 31.62 1000 USD in Luxembourg as of 2019.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Luxembourg and Senegal?
- 1.64 1000 USD, with Senegal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Senegal?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2019.
- How do Luxembourg and Senegal rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Luxembourg ranks 112th and Senegal ranks 110th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf