Madagascar vs Namibia: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Madagascar
- Namibia
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 0.12 1000 USD against 0.09 1000 USD in Namibia, a difference of 0.03 1000 USD.
That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.3 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Madagascar ahead.
Madagascar ranks 164th and Namibia ranks 166th of 173 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Madagascar | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.23 1000 USD | 10.02 1000 USD | 66.21 1000 USD | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 13.25 1000 USD | 15.69 1000 USD | 2.45 1000 USD | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Madagascar or Namibia?
- Madagascar, at 0.12 1000 USD against 0.09 1000 USD in Namibia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Madagascar and Namibia?
- 0.03 1000 USD, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Namibia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2019.
- How do Madagascar and Namibia rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Madagascar ranks 164th and Namibia ranks 166th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf