Morocco vs Rwanda: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Morocco
- Rwanda
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 10.31 1000 USD against 8.17 1000 USD in Rwanda, a difference of 2.14 1000 USD.
That makes Morocco's figure about 1.3 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Morocco ahead.
Morocco ranks 129th and Rwanda ranks 132nd of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Morocco averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Morocco | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,980 1000 USD | 47.48 1000 USD | 1,932 1000 USD | Morocco |
| 2010s | 7.41 1000 USD | 7.56 1000 USD | 0.145 1000 USD | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 10.31 1000 USD | 12.87 1000 USD | 2.56 1000 USD | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Morocco or Rwanda?
- Morocco, at 10.31 1000 USD against 8.17 1000 USD in Rwanda as of 2020.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Morocco and Rwanda?
- 2.14 1000 USD, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Rwanda?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2020.
- How do Morocco and Rwanda rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Morocco ranks 129th and Rwanda ranks 132nd of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf