Myanmar vs Uruguay: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Myanmar
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 16,318 1000 USD against 15,840 1000 USD in Myanmar, a difference of 478 1000 USD.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Uruguay ahead.
Myanmar ranks 19th and Uruguay ranks 17th of 173 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,548 1000 USD | 10,584 1000 USD | 9,036 1000 USD | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 784.98 1000 USD | 25,273 1000 USD | 24,488 1000 USD | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 5,301 1000 USD | 18,009 1000 USD | 12,707 1000 USD | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Myanmar or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 16,318 1000 USD against 15,840 1000 USD in Myanmar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Myanmar and Uruguay?
- 478 1000 USD, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Uruguay?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Myanmar and Uruguay rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Myanmar ranks 19th and Uruguay ranks 17th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf