Nicaragua vs Norway: Superphosphates above 35% β Import value
Superphosphates above 35% β Import value over time
- Nicaragua
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 123.35 1000 USD against 112.16 1000 USD in Nicaragua, a difference of 11.19 1000 USD.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.1 times Nicaragua's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 85th and Norway ranks 84th of 173 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.52 1000 USD | 66.72 1000 USD | 0.8 1000 USD | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 196.39 1000 USD | 123.6 1000 USD | 72.79 1000 USD | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% β import value, Nicaragua or Norway?
- Norway, at 123.35 1000 USD against 112.16 1000 USD in Nicaragua as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% β import value between Nicaragua and Norway?
- 11.19 1000 USD, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Norway?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2016.
- How do Nicaragua and Norway rank globally for superphosphates above 35% β import value?
- Nicaragua ranks 85th and Norway ranks 84th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% β Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf