Oman vs Viet Nam: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Oman
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Oman currently reports 489.44 1000 USD against 444.69 1000 USD in Viet Nam, a difference of 44.75 1000 USD.
That makes Oman's figure about 1.1 times Viet Nam's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Oman ranks 57th and Viet Nam ranks 60th of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Oman averaged higher in 1 and Viet Nam in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 396.76 1000 USD | 1,207 1000 USD | 810.16 1000 USD | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 408.14 1000 USD | 1,049 1000 USD | 641.15 1000 USD | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 583.01 1000 USD | 196.58 1000 USD | 386.43 1000 USD | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Oman or Viet Nam?
- Oman, at 489.44 1000 USD against 444.69 1000 USD in Viet Nam as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Oman and Viet Nam?
- 44.75 1000 USD, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Viet Nam?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do Oman and Viet Nam rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Oman ranks 57th and Viet Nam ranks 60th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf