Pakistan vs Peru: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Pakistan
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 1,879 1000 USD against 1,585 1000 USD in Pakistan, a difference of 294 1000 USD.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.2 times Pakistan's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Pakistan ahead.
Pakistan ranks 43rd and Peru ranks 40th of 163 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9,152 1000 USD | 898.68 1000 USD | 8,253 1000 USD | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 1,644 1000 USD | 940.05 1000 USD | 703.72 1000 USD | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 1,065 1000 USD | 1,095 1000 USD | 29.72 1000 USD | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Pakistan or Peru?
- Peru, at 1,879 1000 USD against 1,585 1000 USD in Pakistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Pakistan and Peru?
- 294 1000 USD, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Peru?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Pakistan and Peru rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Pakistan ranks 43rd and Peru ranks 40th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf