Pakistan vs Slovenia: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Pakistan
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 1,784 1000 USD against 1,585 1000 USD in Pakistan, a difference of 199 1000 USD.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.1 times Pakistan's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Pakistan ahead.
Pakistan ranks 43rd and Slovenia ranks 41st of 163 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Pakistan | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9,152 1000 USD | 87.62 1000 USD | 9,064 1000 USD | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 1,644 1000 USD | 166.31 1000 USD | 1,477 1000 USD | Pakistan |
| 2020s | 1,065 1000 USD | 365.35 1000 USD | 699.51 1000 USD | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Pakistan or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 1,784 1000 USD against 1,585 1000 USD in Pakistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Pakistan and Slovenia?
- 199 1000 USD, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Slovenia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Pakistan and Slovenia rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Pakistan ranks 43rd and Slovenia ranks 41st of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf