Poland vs Uruguay: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Poland
- Uruguay
How they compare
Poland currently reports 17,206 1000 USD against 16,318 1000 USD in Uruguay, a difference of 888 1000 USD.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Uruguay ahead.
Poland ranks 15th and Uruguay ranks 17th of 173 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 120.18 1000 USD | 10,996 1000 USD | 10,876 1000 USD | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 1,436 1000 USD | 24,314 1000 USD | 22,878 1000 USD | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 12,487 1000 USD | 18,770 1000 USD | 6,283 1000 USD | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Poland or Uruguay?
- Poland, at 17,206 1000 USD against 16,318 1000 USD in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Poland and Uruguay?
- 888 1000 USD, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Uruguay?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Poland and Uruguay rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Poland ranks 15th and Uruguay ranks 17th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf