Serbia vs Türkiye: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Serbia
- Türkiye
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 19,460 1000 USD against 16,550 1000 USD in Türkiye, a difference of 2,910 1000 USD.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Türkiye's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Türkiye ahead.
Serbia ranks 13th and Türkiye ranks 16th of 173 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 1 and Türkiye in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 776.15 1000 USD | 9,241 1000 USD | 8,465 1000 USD | Türkiye |
| 2010s | 74.66 1000 USD | 8,833 1000 USD | 8,759 1000 USD | Türkiye |
| 2020s | 19,460 1000 USD | 16,015 1000 USD | 3,445 1000 USD | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Serbia or Türkiye?
- Serbia, at 19,460 1000 USD against 16,550 1000 USD in Türkiye as of 2023.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Serbia and Türkiye?
- 2,910 1000 USD, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Türkiye?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Serbia and Türkiye rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Serbia ranks 13th and Türkiye ranks 16th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf