Serbia vs Uruguay: Superphosphates above 35% — Import value
Superphosphates above 35% — Import value over time
- Serbia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 19,460 1000 USD against 16,318 1000 USD in Uruguay, a difference of 3,142 1000 USD.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.2 times Uruguay's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Serbia ranks 12th and Uruguay ranks 15th of 163 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 776.15 1000 USD | 14,218 1000 USD | 13,442 1000 USD | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 74.66 1000 USD | 25,307 1000 USD | 25,232 1000 USD | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 19,460 1000 USD | 19,716 1000 USD | 255.5 1000 USD | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — import value, Serbia or Uruguay?
- Serbia, at 19,460 1000 USD against 16,318 1000 USD in Uruguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — import value between Serbia and Uruguay?
- 3,142 1000 USD, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Uruguay?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Serbia and Uruguay rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — import value?
- Serbia ranks 12th and Uruguay ranks 15th of 163 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf