Luxembourg vs New Caledonia: Superphosphates above 35% β Production
Luxembourg
0 t
in 2024
New Caledonia
15 t
in 2021
Luxembourg rank
19th
New Caledonia rank
18th
Superphosphates above 35% β Production over time
- Luxembourg
- New Caledonia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 15 t against 0 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 15 t.
Across all 5 years both countries report, New Caledonia has been ahead every year.
Luxembourg ranks 19th and New Caledonia ranks 18th of 52 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t | 31.49 t | 31.49 t | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 0 t | 14.5 t | 14.5 t | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% β production, Luxembourg or New Caledonia?
- New Caledonia, at 15 t against 0 t in Luxembourg as of 2021.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% β production between Luxembourg and New Caledonia?
- 15 t, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and New Caledonia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2021.
- How do Luxembourg and New Caledonia rank globally for superphosphates above 35% β production?
- Luxembourg ranks 19th and New Caledonia ranks 18th of 52 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% β Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf