Malawi vs Slovenia: Superphosphates above 35% — Production

Malawi
0 t
in 2024
Slovenia
0 t
in 2024
Malawi rank
23rd
Slovenia rank
23rd

Superphosphates above 35% — Production over time

  • Malawi
  • Slovenia
00.0020.0040.0060.0080.01200720152024

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Slovenia, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Slovenia ahead.

Malawi ranks 23rd and Slovenia ranks 23rd of 57 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Slovenia Difference Ahead
2010s 0 t 0 t 0 t
2020s 0.002 t 0 t 0.002 t Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — production, Malawi or Slovenia?
Malawi, at 0 t against 0 t in Slovenia as of 2024.
What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — production between Malawi and Slovenia?
0 t, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Slovenia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
How do Malawi and Slovenia rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — production?
Malawi ranks 23rd and Slovenia ranks 23rd of 57 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Superphosphates above 35% — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
57 places, 635 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf