New Caledonia vs Russian Federation: Superphosphates above 35% — Production
Superphosphates above 35% — Production over time
- New Caledonia
- Russian Federation
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 15 t against 0 t in Russian Federation, a difference of 15 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Russian Federation ahead.
New Caledonia ranks 18th and Russian Federation ranks 19th of 53 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 31.49 t | 433.33 t | 401.85 t | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 14.5 t | 0 t | 14.5 t | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates above 35% — production, New Caledonia or Russian Federation?
- New Caledonia, at 15 t against 0 t in Russian Federation as of 2021.
- What is the difference in superphosphates above 35% — production between New Caledonia and Russian Federation?
- 15 t, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Russian Federation?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2021.
- How do New Caledonia and Russian Federation rank globally for superphosphates above 35% — production?
- New Caledonia ranks 18th and Russian Federation ranks 19th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates above 35% — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf