Argentina vs Mexico: Superphosphates, other — Agricultural Use
Superphosphates, other — Agricultural Use over time
- Argentina
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 2.00 million t against 379,669 t in Argentina, a difference of 1.62 million t.
That makes Mexico's figure about 5.3 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Mexico ahead.
Argentina ranks 6th and Mexico ranks 3rd of 50 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 205,928 t | 1.74 million t | 1.53 million t | Mexico |
| 2010s | 234,033 t | 2.11 million t | 1.87 million t | Mexico |
| 2020s | 373,818 t | 2.21 million t | 1.83 million t | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates, other — agricultural use, Argentina or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 2.00 million t against 379,669 t in Argentina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in superphosphates, other — agricultural use between Argentina and Mexico?
- 1.62 million t, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Mexico?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Mexico rank globally for superphosphates, other — agricultural use?
- Argentina ranks 6th and Mexico ranks 3rd of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates, other — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf