Armenia vs Norway: Superphosphates, other — Agricultural Use

Armenia
0 t
in 2022
Norway
0 t
in 2024
Armenia rank
38th
Norway rank
38th

Superphosphates, other — Agricultural Use over time

  • Armenia
  • Norway
0200400600200820162024

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Norway, a difference of 0 t.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.

Armenia ranks 38th and Norway ranks 38th of 50 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Norway Difference Ahead
2000s 15 t 530 t 515 t Norway
2010s 0 t 0 t 0 t
2020s 0 t 0 t 0 t

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher superphosphates, other — agricultural use, Armenia or Norway?
Armenia, at 0 t against 0 t in Norway as of 2022.
What is the difference in superphosphates, other — agricultural use between Armenia and Norway?
0 t, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Norway?
6 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
How do Armenia and Norway rank globally for superphosphates, other — agricultural use?
Armenia ranks 38th and Norway ranks 38th of 50 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates, other — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Superphosphates, other — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
51 places, 578 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf