Austria vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Superphosphates, other — Agricultural Use
Superphosphates, other — Agricultural Use over time
- Austria
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
How they compare
Austria currently reports 800 t against 534 t in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 266 t.
That makes Austria's figure about 1.5 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Austria has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 25th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 26th of 47 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,136 t | 144 t | 992 t | Austria |
| 2010s | 800 t | 588.5 t | 211.5 t | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates, other — agricultural use, Austria or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Austria, at 800 t against 534 t in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2011.
- What is the difference in superphosphates, other — agricultural use between Austria and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 266 t, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2011.
- How do Austria and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for superphosphates, other — agricultural use?
- Austria ranks 25th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 26th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates, other — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf