Cyprus vs Peru: Superphosphates, other — Agricultural Use

Cyprus
0 t
in 2024
Peru
0 t
in 2021
Cyprus rank
38th
Peru rank
38th

Superphosphates, other — Agricultural Use over time

  • Cyprus
  • Peru
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k200320132024

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Peru, a difference of 0 t.

Across all 11 years both countries report, Peru has been ahead every year.

Cyprus ranks 38th and Peru ranks 38th of 50 countries.

Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Peru Difference Ahead
2000s 12 t 3,547 t 3,535 t Peru
2010s 2.5 t 3,058 t 3,055 t Peru
2020s 0 t 4,585 t 4,585 t Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher superphosphates, other — agricultural use, Cyprus or Peru?
Cyprus, at 0 t against 0 t in Peru as of 2024.
What is the difference in superphosphates, other — agricultural use between Cyprus and Peru?
0 t, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Peru?
11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2021.
How do Cyprus and Peru rank globally for superphosphates, other — agricultural use?
Cyprus ranks 38th and Peru ranks 38th of 50 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates, other — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Superphosphates, other — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
51 places, 578 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf