French Polynesia vs Slovakia: Superphosphates, other β Agricultural Use
Superphosphates, other β Agricultural Use over time
- French Polynesia
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 194 t against 1 t in French Polynesia, a difference of 193 t.
That makes Slovakia's figure about 194.0 times French Polynesia's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Slovakia has been ahead every year.
French Polynesia ranks 36th and Slovakia ranks 33rd of 50 countries.
Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.25 t | 880.5 t | 880.25 t | Slovakia |
| 2020s | 0.3333 t | 443.67 t | 443.33 t | Slovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates, other β agricultural use, French Polynesia or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 194 t against 1 t in French Polynesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates, other β agricultural use between French Polynesia and Slovakia?
- 193 t, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Slovakia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2022.
- How do French Polynesia and Slovakia rank globally for superphosphates, other β agricultural use?
- French Polynesia ranks 36th and Slovakia ranks 33rd of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates, other β Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf