French Polynesia vs Slovenia: Superphosphates, other — Agricultural Use
Superphosphates, other — Agricultural Use over time
- French Polynesia
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 125 t against 1 t in French Polynesia, a difference of 124 t.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 125.0 times French Polynesia's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.
French Polynesia ranks 36th and Slovenia ranks 34th of 50 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.25 t | 600.5 t | 600.25 t | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 0.3333 t | 390.67 t | 390.33 t | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates, other — agricultural use, French Polynesia or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 125 t against 1 t in French Polynesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates, other — agricultural use between French Polynesia and Slovenia?
- 124 t, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Slovenia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2022.
- How do French Polynesia and Slovenia rank globally for superphosphates, other — agricultural use?
- French Polynesia ranks 36th and Slovenia ranks 34th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates, other — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf