Iceland vs Lesotho: Superphosphates, other β€” Agricultural Use

Iceland
1 t
in 2023
Lesotho
0 t
in 2020
Iceland rank
36th
Lesotho rank
38th

Superphosphates, other β€” Agricultural Use over time

  • Iceland
  • Lesotho
0200400600201520192023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 1 t against 0 t in Lesotho, a difference of 1 t.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Lesotho has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 36th and Lesotho ranks 38th of 50 countries.

Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Lesotho Difference Ahead
2010s 0 t 224.5 t 224.5 t Lesotho
2020s 0 t 0 t 0 t β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher superphosphates, other β€” agricultural use, Iceland or Lesotho?
Iceland, at 1 t against 0 t in Lesotho as of 2023.
What is the difference in superphosphates, other β€” agricultural use between Iceland and Lesotho?
1 t, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Lesotho?
5 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2020.
How do Iceland and Lesotho rank globally for superphosphates, other β€” agricultural use?
Iceland ranks 36th and Lesotho ranks 38th of 50 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates, other β€” Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Superphosphates, other β€” Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
51 places, 578 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf