Iceland vs Norway: Superphosphates, other — Agricultural Use

Iceland
1 t
in 2023
Norway
0 t
in 2024
Iceland rank
36th
Norway rank
38th

Superphosphates, other — Agricultural Use over time

  • Iceland
  • Norway
0200400600200820162024

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 1 t against 0 t in Norway, a difference of 1 t.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Norway ahead.

Iceland ranks 36th and Norway ranks 38th of 50 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Norway Difference Ahead
2010s 0 t 0 t 0 t
2020s 0.25 t 0 t 0.25 t Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher superphosphates, other — agricultural use, Iceland or Norway?
Iceland, at 1 t against 0 t in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in superphosphates, other — agricultural use between Iceland and Norway?
1 t, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Norway?
9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Norway rank globally for superphosphates, other — agricultural use?
Iceland ranks 36th and Norway ranks 38th of 50 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates, other — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Superphosphates, other — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
51 places, 578 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf