Mauritius vs Slovakia: Superphosphates, other — Agricultural Use

Mauritius
300 t
in 2024
Slovakia
194 t
in 2024
Mauritius rank
32nd
Slovakia rank
33rd

Superphosphates, other — Agricultural Use over time

  • Mauritius
  • Slovakia
02.0k4.0k6.0k200520142024

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 300 t against 194 t in Slovakia, a difference of 106 t.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.5 times Slovakia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2020 it was Slovakia ahead.

Mauritius ranks 32nd and Slovakia ranks 33rd of 50 countries.

Slovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher superphosphates, other — agricultural use, Mauritius or Slovakia?
Mauritius, at 300 t against 194 t in Slovakia as of 2024.
What is the difference in superphosphates, other — agricultural use between Mauritius and Slovakia?
106 t, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Slovakia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2024.
How do Mauritius and Slovakia rank globally for superphosphates, other — agricultural use?
Mauritius ranks 32nd and Slovakia ranks 33rd of 50 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates, other — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Superphosphates, other — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
51 places, 578 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf