Mauritius vs Slovenia: Superphosphates, other — Agricultural Use

Mauritius
300 t
in 2024
Slovenia
125 t
in 2024
Mauritius rank
32nd
Slovenia rank
34th

Superphosphates, other — Agricultural Use over time

  • Mauritius
  • Slovenia
01.0k2.0k3.0k200220132024

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 300 t against 125 t in Slovenia, a difference of 175 t.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 2.4 times Slovenia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2020 it was Slovenia ahead.

Mauritius ranks 32nd and Slovenia ranks 34th of 50 countries.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher superphosphates, other — agricultural use, Mauritius or Slovenia?
Mauritius, at 300 t against 125 t in Slovenia as of 2024.
What is the difference in superphosphates, other — agricultural use between Mauritius and Slovenia?
175 t, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Slovenia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2024.
How do Mauritius and Slovenia rank globally for superphosphates, other — agricultural use?
Mauritius ranks 32nd and Slovenia ranks 34th of 50 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates, other — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Superphosphates, other — Agricultural Use
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
51 places, 578 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf