Republic of Korea vs Uruguay: Superphosphates, other — Agricultural Use
Superphosphates, other — Agricultural Use over time
- Republic of Korea
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 59,010 t against 17,808 t in Republic of Korea, a difference of 41,202 t.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 3.3 times Republic of Korea's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Republic of Korea ahead.
Republic of Korea ranks 15th and Uruguay ranks 12th of 47 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Korea | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18,204 t | 23,649 t | 5,445 t | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 10,792 t | 44,719 t | 33,927 t | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates, other — agricultural use, Republic of Korea or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 59,010 t against 17,808 t in Republic of Korea as of 2018.
- What is the difference in superphosphates, other — agricultural use between Republic of Korea and Uruguay?
- 41,202 t, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Uruguay?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2018.
- How do Republic of Korea and Uruguay rank globally for superphosphates, other — agricultural use?
- Republic of Korea ranks 15th and Uruguay ranks 12th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates, other — Agricultural Use. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf