Croatia vs Eswatini: Superphosphates, other — Import value
Superphosphates, other — Import value over time
- Croatia
- Eswatini
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 30.37 1000 USD against 14.52 1000 USD in Eswatini, a difference of 15.85 1000 USD.
That makes Croatia's figure about 2.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Eswatini ahead.
Croatia ranks 68th and Eswatini ranks 71st of 89 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 95.58 1000 USD | 759.41 1000 USD | 663.83 1000 USD | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 135.8 1000 USD | 280.6 1000 USD | 144.8 1000 USD | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates, other — import value, Croatia or Eswatini?
- Croatia, at 30.37 1000 USD against 14.52 1000 USD in Eswatini as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates, other — import value between Croatia and Eswatini?
- 15.85 1000 USD, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Eswatini?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
- How do Croatia and Eswatini rank globally for superphosphates, other — import value?
- Croatia ranks 68th and Eswatini ranks 71st of 89 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates, other — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf