Croatia vs Luxembourg: Superphosphates, other — Import value
Superphosphates, other — Import value over time
- Croatia
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 38.08 1000 USD against 30.37 1000 USD in Croatia, a difference of 7.71 1000 USD.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.3 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 68th and Luxembourg ranks 66th of 89 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 112.32 1000 USD | 11.81 1000 USD | 100.51 1000 USD | Croatia |
| 2020s | 114.71 1000 USD | 27.01 1000 USD | 87.7 1000 USD | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates, other — import value, Croatia or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 38.08 1000 USD against 30.37 1000 USD in Croatia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates, other — import value between Croatia and Luxembourg?
- 7.71 1000 USD, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Luxembourg?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Luxembourg rank globally for superphosphates, other — import value?
- Croatia ranks 68th and Luxembourg ranks 66th of 89 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates, other — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf