South Africa vs Türkiye: Superphosphates, other — Import value
Superphosphates, other — Import value over time
- South Africa
- Türkiye
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 4,640 1000 USD against 4,153 1000 USD in Türkiye, a difference of 487 1000 USD.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Türkiye's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2017 it was South Africa ahead.
South Africa ranks 18th and Türkiye ranks 17th of 30 groups.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3,336 1000 USD | 508.26 1000 USD | 2,828 1000 USD | South Africa |
| 2020s | 5,226 1000 USD | 4,736 1000 USD | 490.45 1000 USD | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher superphosphates, other — import value, South Africa or Türkiye?
- South Africa, at 4,640 1000 USD against 4,153 1000 USD in Türkiye as of 2024.
- What is the difference in superphosphates, other — import value between South Africa and Türkiye?
- 487 1000 USD, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Türkiye?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do South Africa and Türkiye rank globally for superphosphates, other — import value?
- South Africa ranks 18th and Türkiye ranks 17th of 30 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates, other — Import value. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf