Malawi vs Mauritius: Superphosphates, other — Production

Malawi
0 t
in 2024
Mauritius
0 t
in 2024
Malawi rank
18th
Mauritius rank
18th

Superphosphates, other — Production over time

  • Malawi
  • Mauritius
02.0k4.0k6.0k200620152024

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Mauritius, a difference of 0 t.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Mauritius ahead.

Malawi ranks 18th and Mauritius ranks 18th of 51 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Mauritius Difference Ahead
2010s 0 t 0 t 0 t
2020s 1,036 t 0 t 1,036 t Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher superphosphates, other — production, Malawi or Mauritius?
Malawi, at 0 t against 0 t in Mauritius as of 2024.
What is the difference in superphosphates, other — production between Malawi and Mauritius?
0 t, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Mauritius?
12 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
How do Malawi and Mauritius rank globally for superphosphates, other — production?
Malawi ranks 18th and Mauritius ranks 18th of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Superphosphates, other — Production. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Superphosphates, other — Production
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
51 places, 558 data points, 2002–2024
Last refreshed

The Fertilizers by Product dataset contains information on the Production, Trade and Agriculture Use of inorganic (chemical or mineral) fertilizers products. The fertilizer statistics data are for a set of 23 product categories. Both straight and compound fertilizers are included. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/RFB/RFB_EN_README.pdf