Bahamas vs Zimbabwe: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita

Bahamas
0.0006 kg per person
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0008 kg per person
in 2023
Bahamas rank
122nd
Zimbabwe rank
119th

Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita over time

  • Bahamas
  • Zimbabwe
00.0010.0020.0030.004196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0008 kg per person against 0.0006 kg per person in Bahamas, a difference of 0.0002 kg per person.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Bahamas's.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 122nd and Zimbabwe ranks 119th of 149 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0035 kg per person 0.0011 kg per person 0.0024 kg per person Bahamas
1970s 0.0018 kg per person 0.0011 kg per person 0.0007 kg per person Bahamas
1980s 0.0012 kg per person 0.0008 kg per person 0.0004 kg per person Bahamas
1990s 0.0008 kg per person 0.0008 kg per person 0 kg per person Bahamas
2000s 0.0007 kg per person 0.0007 kg per person 0 kg per person Bahamas
2010s 0.0006 kg per person 0.0007 kg per person 0.0001 kg per person Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0006 kg per person 0.0007 kg per person 0.0001 kg per person Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita, Bahamas or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0008 kg per person against 0.0006 kg per person in Bahamas as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita between Bahamas and Zimbabwe?
0.0002 kg per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Zimbabwe rank globally for swine, breeding — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita?
Bahamas ranks 122nd and Zimbabwe ranks 119th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Zimbabwe: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/bahamas-the/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/bahamas-the/zimbabwe/">Bahamas vs Zimbabwe: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita
Unit
kg per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.