Belize vs Ecuador: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita

Belize
0.0027 kg per person
in 2023
Ecuador
0.0027 kg per person
in 2023
Belize rank
92nd
Ecuador rank
91st

Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita over time

  • Belize
  • Ecuador
00.0050.010.0150.02196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.0027 kg per person against 0.0027 kg per person in Belize, a difference of 0 kg per person.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Belize ranks 92nd and Ecuador ranks 91st of 149 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0066 kg per person 0.0147 kg per person 0.0081 kg per person Ecuador
1970s 0.0066 kg per person 0.0175 kg per person 0.0109 kg per person Ecuador
1980s 0.0063 kg per person 0.0152 kg per person 0.009 kg per person Ecuador
1990s 0.0059 kg per person 0.0106 kg per person 0.0047 kg per person Ecuador
2000s 0.0035 kg per person 0.0051 kg per person 0.0016 kg per person Ecuador
2010s 0.003 kg per person 0.0043 kg per person 0.0013 kg per person Ecuador
2020s 0.0027 kg per person 0.0028 kg per person 0.0001 kg per person Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita, Belize or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 0.0027 kg per person against 0.0027 kg per person in Belize as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita between Belize and Ecuador?
0 kg per person, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Ecuador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Belize and Ecuador rank globally for swine, breeding — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita?
Belize ranks 92nd and Ecuador ranks 91st of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belize vs Ecuador: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/belize/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/belize/ecuador/">Belize vs Ecuador: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita
Unit
kg per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.