Botswana vs Equatorial Guinea: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita

Botswana
0.0001 kg per person
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
0.0001 kg per person
in 2023
Botswana rank
137th
Equatorial Guinea rank
135th

Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita over time

  • Botswana
  • Equatorial Guinea
0000.0010.0010.001196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.0001 kg per person against 0.0001 kg per person in Botswana, a difference of 0 kg per person.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 137th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 135th of 149 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Equatorial Guinea in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0004 kg per person 0.0004 kg per person 0 kg per person Botswana
1970s 0.0007 kg per person 0.0005 kg per person 0.0002 kg per person Botswana
1980s 0.0003 kg per person 0.0004 kg per person 0.0002 kg per person Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.0001 kg per person 0.0003 kg per person 0.0002 kg per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.0002 kg per person 0.0002 kg per person 0.0001 kg per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0001 kg per person 0.0002 kg per person 0.0001 kg per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0001 kg per person 0.0001 kg per person 0.0001 kg per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita, Botswana or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.0001 kg per person against 0.0001 kg per person in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita between Botswana and Equatorial Guinea?
0 kg per person, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Equatorial Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for swine, breeding — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita?
Botswana ranks 137th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 135th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Equatorial Guinea: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/botswana/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/botswana/equatorial-guinea/">Botswana vs Equatorial Guinea: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita
Unit
kg per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.