Ecuador vs Nepal: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita

Ecuador
0.0027 kg per person
in 2023
Nepal
0.003 kg per person
in 2023
Ecuador rank
91st
Nepal rank
88th

Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita over time

  • Ecuador
  • Nepal
00.0050.010.0150.02196119922023

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 0.003 kg per person against 0.0027 kg per person in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0003 kg per person.

That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 91st and Nepal ranks 88th of 149 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 6 and Nepal in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0147 kg per person 0.0014 kg per person 0.0133 kg per person Ecuador
1970s 0.0175 kg per person 0.0015 kg per person 0.016 kg per person Ecuador
1980s 0.0152 kg per person 0.0017 kg per person 0.0136 kg per person Ecuador
1990s 0.0106 kg per person 0.0019 kg per person 0.0087 kg per person Ecuador
2000s 0.0051 kg per person 0.0024 kg per person 0.0027 kg per person Ecuador
2010s 0.0043 kg per person 0.0029 kg per person 0.0014 kg per person Ecuador
2020s 0.0028 kg per person 0.0033 kg per person 0.0005 kg per person Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita, Ecuador or Nepal?
Nepal, at 0.003 kg per person against 0.0027 kg per person in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita between Ecuador and Nepal?
0.0003 kg per person, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Nepal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Nepal rank globally for swine, breeding — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita?
Ecuador ranks 91st and Nepal ranks 88th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Nepal: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/ecuador/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/ecuador/nepal/">Ecuador vs Nepal: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita
Unit
kg per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.