Finland vs New Caledonia: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita

Finland
0.1701 kg per person
in 2023
New Caledonia
0.1704 kg per person
in 2023
Finland rank
23rd
New Caledonia rank
22nd

Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita over time

  • Finland
  • New Caledonia
0.10.150.20.250.3196119922023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.1704 kg per person against 0.1701 kg per person in Finland, a difference of 0.0003 kg per person.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Finland ranks 23rd and New Caledonia ranks 22nd of 149 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 6 and New Caledonia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1363 kg per person 0.2793 kg per person 0.143 kg per person New Caledonia
1970s 0.2365 kg per person 0.2075 kg per person 0.0289 kg per person Finland
1980s 0.2716 kg per person 0.2532 kg per person 0.0184 kg per person Finland
1990s 0.2574 kg per person 0.1954 kg per person 0.0619 kg per person Finland
2000s 0.253 kg per person 0.1666 kg per person 0.0864 kg per person Finland
2010s 0.2169 kg per person 0.1742 kg per person 0.0427 kg per person Finland
2020s 0.1816 kg per person 0.1716 kg per person 0.01 kg per person Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita, Finland or New Caledonia?
New Caledonia, at 0.1704 kg per person against 0.1701 kg per person in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita between Finland and New Caledonia?
0.0003 kg per person, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and New Caledonia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Finland and New Caledonia rank globally for swine, breeding — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita?
Finland ranks 23rd and New Caledonia ranks 22nd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs New Caledonia: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/finland/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/finland/new-caledonia/">Finland vs New Caledonia: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita
Unit
kg per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.