Puerto Rico vs Zimbabwe: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita

Puerto Rico
0.0006 kg per person
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0008 kg per person
in 2023
Puerto Rico rank
121st
Zimbabwe rank
119th

Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita over time

  • Puerto Rico
  • Zimbabwe
00.0010.0020.0030.0040.005196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0008 kg per person against 0.0006 kg per person in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0.0002 kg per person.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Puerto Rico's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Puerto Rico ranks 121st and Zimbabwe ranks 119th of 149 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Puerto Rico averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Puerto Rico Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0033 kg per person 0.0011 kg per person 0.0022 kg per person Puerto Rico
1970s 0.004 kg per person 0.0011 kg per person 0.0029 kg per person Puerto Rico
1980s 0.003 kg per person 0.0008 kg per person 0.0022 kg per person Puerto Rico
1990s 0.0024 kg per person 0.0008 kg per person 0.0016 kg per person Puerto Rico
2000s 0.0009 kg per person 0.0007 kg per person 0.0002 kg per person Puerto Rico
2010s 0.0006 kg per person 0.0007 kg per person 0.0001 kg per person Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0006 kg per person 0.0007 kg per person 0.0001 kg per person Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita, Puerto Rico or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0008 kg per person against 0.0006 kg per person in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita between Puerto Rico and Zimbabwe?
0.0002 kg per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Puerto Rico and Zimbabwe rank globally for swine, breeding — losses from manure treated (n content), per capita?
Puerto Rico ranks 121st and Zimbabwe ranks 119th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Puerto Rico vs Zimbabwe: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/puerto-rico-us/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-capita/puerto-rico-us/zimbabwe/">Puerto Rico vs Zimbabwe: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per capita
Unit
kg per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,689 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.