Angola vs China: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of

Angola
0 kg per US$ of GDP
in 2023
China
0 kg per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Angola rank
72nd
China rank
73rd

Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of over time

  • Angola
  • China
0000196119922023

How they compare

Angola currently reports 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in China, a difference of 0 kg per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1980 it was China ahead.

Angola ranks 72nd and China ranks 73rd of 149 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and China in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola China Difference Ahead
1980s 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP China
1990s 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP China
2000s 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP China
2010s 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP China
2020s 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of, Angola or China?
Angola, at 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of between Angola and China?
0 kg per US$ of GDP, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and China?
44 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
How do Angola and China rank globally for swine, breeding — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of?
Angola ranks 72nd and China ranks 73rd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs China: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/angola/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/angola/china/">Angola vs China: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP
Unit
kg per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,190 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.