Australia vs Rwanda: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of

Australia
0 kg per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Rwanda
0 kg per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Australia rank
58th
Rwanda rank
61st

Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of over time

  • Australia
  • Rwanda
00000196119922023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Rwanda, a difference of 0 kg per US$ of GDP.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 58th and Rwanda ranks 61st of 149 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0.0001 kg per US$ of GDP Australia
1970s 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP Australia
1980s 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP Australia
1990s 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP Australia
2000s 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP Australia
2010s 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP Rwanda
2020s 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP 0 kg per US$ of GDP Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher swine, breeding — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of, Australia or Rwanda?
Australia, at 0 kg per US$ of GDP against 0 kg per US$ of GDP in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in swine, breeding — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of between Australia and Rwanda?
0 kg per US$ of GDP, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Rwanda rank globally for swine, breeding — losses from manure treated (n content), per unit of?
Australia ranks 58th and Rwanda ranks 61st of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Rwanda: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 October 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/swine-breeding-losses-from-manure-treated-n-content-per-unit-of-gdp/australia/rwanda/">Australia vs Rwanda: Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content), per unit of GDP
Unit
kg per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
151 places, 8,190 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Swine, breeding — Losses from manure treated (N content) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.